Oh what a tangled web we weave.

When Ted Cruz and several others set out on the anti Obama Care crusade which led to the Government shutdown everyone was equally split between saying he was an asshole and saying he was right, well now a month into the launch of the healthcare.gov website and the activating of the NOT so Affordable Care Act people are starting to see the truth. When the Senator who wrote it for Barack Obama it would seem he was much to busy playing golf to do so himself. Well since the launch of the web site that does not work and the tremendously long wait time on the phone lines for said law even the Democrats who so openly supported the ACA are turning against it, now even the Democrats who supported it particularly those up for re election in 2014 are calling for a one year delay to get things working correctly. I find it humorous that even the Democrats are against it now for various reasons however in the over all scope of events their is nothing funny about the Affordable Care Act in and of itself starting out with the eighteen new taxes it will levy on middle class Americans that is bad enough as it is. Unlike a lot of people who are so pro Obama and take his every word as the undisputed truth I actually read the 2404 page ABOMINATION that is the ACA I also read the 100 plus pages of Congressional Pork Rinds thrown in for good measure. now as I understand it there are 20 thousand pages of regulations for the enactment? So after three years nearly a billion dollars spent on the site and 20 thousand pages of regulations for good measure the Affordable Care Act is sinking faster than the Titanic, poetic justice perhaps? No I think not it was doomed to failure from the conception simply because you cannot force Socialism down the throats of the unwilling. If you have studied American History and I do not mean that common core bullshit that this administration is pushing you would perhaps notice a few things, perhaps you would notice that a large part of the events that led to the American Revolution are occurring once more a large part of the events that led to the American Civil War are occurring once again. People need to wake the hell up and pay attention to what is happening in this Country, recently Obama and the administration have been rooting out and getting rid of those within the frame of the United States Military who are not in agreement with his policies, and he far more frequently bypasses Constitutional edicts when it suits his needs. Does anyone recall the Communist Revolution in Russia that led to the forming of the U.S.S.R.? or perhaps the rise of Hitler and the Nazi party which came about after he was duly elected to the office of chancellor? Do any of these events have any meaning to people anymore? If not they should because they are happening here and now my friends every single event playing out all over again in living color for all to see, the main problem is the what I have come to call the Obama Zombies or sometimes the Brain Washed Masses do not seem to care that all of their personal liberties are slowly being taken away, well I for one will continue to keep a weather eye on the unfolding events as I am a firm believer in an old saying that everyone should keep in mind for future reference because in these trying political and financial times "CHANCE FAVORS THE PREPARED MIND".

The B.S. behind Benghazi.

Hello one and all I had the opportunity to watch some of the proceedings of the so called whistle blowers on Benghazi before I left for work then had to listen to the recap of the events after I returned home late last night, I must say I was a bit shocked to see these people so willingly toss Susan Rice under the bus blaming her for the brekdown in events that occured and the aftermath. I do not claim myself an expert by any means however the last I knew the Ambassador to the U.N. or for that matter any U.S. Ambassador be it in El Salvador or Thailand works for the State Department ergo they work for the Secretary of State, so when Susan Rice went on television with the talking points she was given to work with on the events who is to blame? Her or the people who gave her the talking points to begin with? For that matter why was not Hilary Clinton herself doing the talk show circuits spreading the mis information it was after all her Department that was under scrutiny. I can guess at at least one reason that being that Susan Rice was available to do this also most likely ordered to do it and did not consider the fact that the talking points she was given were a gaggle of lies and half truths. I guess when you put too much trust in those above you that you work directly for in a politically motivated climate, you should first look at all the particulars yourself and then see what you have been given to work with and ascertain the factuality of what you have in hand. What she did going into the televised media demonstrating blind trust in the administration was basically career suicide, I would imagine that now that they are discussing calling her before them she will probably be reassigned to nowhere tasmania or something to assume the ambassador post there as I am sure that President Obama and his cronies do not want her telling her side of the story. Now on to something else on the situation that I found to be the biggest outright lie yet issued by any Government Official on this situation that being a statement made by the Under Secretary of Defense I believe it was saying that the approximate 7.5 hour time differential between the attacks at the consulate were not enough time to get a response team there. As far as I know I suppose this could have changed over time though not likely there is at least one Carrier and a variety of support vessels in the Medeterannean Sea at all times it is called a fast attack group and the name is there for a reason, from the Med a flight of F22 Raptors and a variety of other carrier bourne strike fighters could have arrived on scene in a very short time frame, these Carriers also have a large contingency of United States Marines on board for security as well as situations of this sort they also could have been on scene in a very short time frame being as there are plenty of choppers on board not to mention a few other types of planes they could have used for a low level air borne insertion if needed. I do know that Embassies and Consulates of the United States are considered as Sovereign U.S. Territory is it not the duty of the President of the United States and the State Department to protect American Territory from attack by all enemies foreign and domestic? So since it was obviously a bull crap statement that no help could have arrived in time and it was also a bullcrap statement that the attack was a spontaneous demonstration in response to an anti muslim video said video was posted on You Tube on July 2nd 2012 by the way and posted by an Egyptian as well, so it would seem that it took the Islamic World 2 months and 9 days to figure out that this video was insulting to them? Not to mention they show up for a spontaneous demonstration armed with heavy assault rifles and shoulder fired missles? Yes I totally believe that (I hope my sarcasm was evident there).The whole attack on the Consulate in Benghazi has been handled so inappropriately by the White House and the State Department that it makes me puke watching the newer events unfold, the President going on television the next day and babbling on about how we must exercise religious tolerance why did it take him 9 days to refer to the attack speciffically as a terrorist event? Why did it take him until the day after the Boston Bombing as a terrorist event? What in the hell does religious tolerance have to do with an American Consulate being attacked by an Al Queda sect and the Ambassador and three other men being killed? When the Ambassador called requesting help because they were under attack why were a few sqaudrons of fighters sent from carriers in the Med or perhaps from the Air Base in Rhiad Saudi Arabia? No I am sorry I do not believe an iota of the bullshit they have shoveled out to the public on this attack, nor should anyone with any knowledge of how the United States Military operates and knows the continuous training that those men and women go through to respond instantly to events like this, if those who have been permanently brainwashed by this man and support his twisted agenda want to believe him that is their call and their right, however for myself I believe that he and the others who choose to do nothing and let people die for no reason should be bought up on a variety of charges, that of course will not happen either as the Department of Justice is run by one of President Obama's finger puppets. I think that if they Impeached Nixon for Water Gate by the way nobody was killed in that particular instance, and impeached Bill Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky affair again nobody died in this affair though he and Monica appearently had a good time with it all, why than is Barack Obama not being impeached for lying about Benghazi and the Fast and Furious debacle? The other two were impeached for lying should Barack Obama not be given equal treatment under the law? Just some food for thought for the day as always you are free to decide right and wrong on your own and at your own terms, until next time Have a great day and a better tomorrow and remember that now more than ever before "CHANCE FAVORS THE PREPARED MIND."

A few things to address today

I guess it has been awhile since I have posted on here not really sure as to why just been busy with the daily task of living and supporting my family I would guess, first off to all the dumbass conspiracy theory people who are claiming that the bombs in Boston Massachusettes were some "False Flag" operation initiated by the Government to get a practice run at Martial Law. Stop already enough is enough those making these claims are obviously entranced by the paranoid fear mongerers in the population today and ned to stop and think for themselves, is not the fear mongering from the Government itself enough? Navy Seals planted the bombs REALLY? 1. If the bombs had been made by any Navy Seals or other Special Operations Forces within the U.S. Military they would have been 3 times more powerful and the death toll would be a lot larger than 3, not to mention all of the bombs would have detonated. 2. What exactly do you see the Government gaining from something like that? I will tell you what is gained absolutely nothing all they would accomplish is the start of a new American Revolution doing so there would be fitting though considering it was the birthplace of the original American Revolution. 3> If this act had been done by Seals or other Special Operators they would not all be dressed identically, nor would any security camera footage been available as they would have been disabled shortly before the actual operation kicked in. So stop with the paranoid delusions and leave the fear mongering to the Government if you want to accomplish something stop voting for the same dumbass people every time an election comes around out with the old in with the new. Now to what I have actually came to write about today the above was not really it, I very recently finished reading President Barack Obama's book and no I do not mean his FICTIONAL BIOGRAPHY "Dreams from my Father" I have no grand desire to read that particular piece of trash. I am referring to his other book titled "The Audacity of Hope Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.", first off I was not aware that the American Dream had been lost so as to need reclaiming and secondly after reading the book I figured out that it never actually gets around to thoughts of Reclaiming the American Dream at all. After reading this and no I did not waste any money to buy it my Wife found it in the "FREE BOOK BIN" where she works and asked me if I wanted it I think she was ready to take my temperature when I told her yes. I will now share with you some of the more entertaining and often contradictory quotes I found in these pages, had this book came out before he was elected to the Presidency I do not think he would ever have been elected. For instance in the first chapter titled Republicans and Democrats he rails against and demonizes all Republicans for there evil campaigning methoods being on the attack and smearing there opponents with every possible media outlet for anything they can dig up on them, what exactly was it he was doing throught the Democratic primaries in 08 and the General election afterwards? Perhaps those exact same things that he lashes out at the Republican party for doing? It would seem that these tactics are abominable unless of course he is using them, appearently these tactics are fine and justified than. Next chapter is on VALUES hmmm that made me cringe a little as I started to read it what follows is a direct quote from the book it is rather interesting in some ways "I would often challenge neighborhood leaders by asking them where they put their time, energy, and money.Those are the true tests of what we value,I'd tell them,regardless of what we like to tell ourselves.If we aren't willing to pay a price for our values, if we aren't willing to make some sacrifices in order to realize them, then we should ask ourselves whether we truly believe in them at all.By these standards at least, it sometimes appears that Americans today value nothing so much as being rich,thin,young,famous,safe, and entertained. We say we value the legacy we leave the next generation and then saddle that generation with mountains of debt. We say we believe in equal opportunity but then stand idle while millions of American children languish in poverty. We insist that we value Family, but than structure our economy and organize our lives so as to ensure that our families get less and less of our time." I find that quote from page 83 a little tarnished by the fact that the mountain of debt he reffered to under his tutalage has gone from the Rocky Mountains to the friggin alps in comparrison, also I can deduce that he believes most people to be as vain as he himself is what with the thin famous and entertained crap which by the way he exemplifies those so called values quite well. As for sacrificing in order to realize them well he has sacrificed alright he has sacrificed the Middle Class Working people of the country so that they now languish in near poverty so that he could realize his values.Though there are many things worthy of commenting on in ensuing chapters to save some time and typing I will jump to chapter 7 perhaps the most controversial and convoluted chapter in the entire book, the chapter is titled "Race" after reading it I think he would have been more accurate to title this chapter "Racist" as after reading this particular chapter twice I realized just how much of a racist the man really is. It starts out speaking of attending the funeral of Rosa Parks which is fine she was at least to my thinking the woman who really started the movement that Martin Luther King took up for Civil Rights in this country, I think that she even more so than Dr. King led to the Civil Rights act of 1964 though that act was a step forward in many respects I do not think it accomplished as much as it should have and indeed needed to. At the 2004 Democratic Convention during his keynmote address he said "There is not a Black America and White America and Latino America and Asian America there is The United States of America he mentions this on page 273-274 and says people often bring that quote up to him when they meet him. He says to people this quote brings to mind for them an America finally freed from the past of Jim Crow and Slavery, Japenese internment camps, and Mexican braceros, work place tensions and Cultural conflict an America that fulfills Dr. King's promise that we be judged not by the color of our skin but by the content of our character. One the Jim Crow laws and Japanese internment camps were both enacted by the Democrats and Two I really do not think he will want people judging him by the content of his character after he leaves office. In all I think people should read chapter 7 of this book quite closely to understand the man who wrote it, amonst other things without actually coming right out and saying it he blames White People for the Black on Black crime in inner city neighborhoods, simply because according to him White people got scared and moved out of these neighborhoods so the Police than stopped patrolling them. He also alludes and says directly several times things involving Black churches as compared to White churhes, though I am no expert on religion that seems to be one area that is color blind. As a matter of fact I can recall from personal experience while in the Navy and in our Home Port of Charleston,S.C. I had to go to the ship on a sunday morning for Damage Control training and my annoying car decided that was a fine morning to not start, being a fairly long walk some 3 miles i stopped and sat on the steps of a Baptist Church to rest for a few minutes and was quite amazed at the sounds of revelry that came from within. While I was sitting a man I would guess he was around the same age as I was peeked out the door and saw me sitting and came down the steps to see if I was alright, I told him what was going on and said I would be fine just resting a moment and a little thirsty. He took me in with him to rest in the air conditioning and got me a glass of water and I sat and observed for a while and I would say that was the friendliest and most exuberant Church service I have ever seen, people of all races were there singing and praying and praising god above and the joy they exuded was startling and very catching if I wouldn't have had to be at the ship i would've stayed for the rest of the service. But enough rambling on at one point he says he is for "Banning all guns in the inner cities" and he also says that when a gang member opens fire into a crowd of people because he thinks that somebody in that crowd disrespected him that is not a crime problem it is a morality problem. Really some kid commiting a random act of violence for some perceived slight is not a crime it is a problem with morality? If he truly believes that than it would seem he has a problem with MORONITY because a crime is a crime regardless of the reasoning or perceived reasoning behind it. He also talks at length about several welfare programs and such created during the "NEW DEAL" era as being directly responsible for the current trends of more African Americans living in poverty than Whites. lets see though he praises the New Deal earlier in the book it is suddenly a bad thing? As for the New Deal programs being responsible for so many African Americans living in poverty I submit that this has far more to do with an exceedingly high unemployment rate amongst both African Americans and Latino's and that is a real shame because at one time in the not to distant past the unemployment rate amongst Whites was Higher than it was amongst African Americans or Latino's. A large portion of chapter 7 he spends blaming the White Man for all the worlds problems I am actually surprised he did not blame White people for the biblical plauges as well, oh also pay close attention to the chapter on faith and religion you will find some surprising and contradictory statements from that chapter than into chapter 7 as well.One of those things that comes directly to mind is the Sermon on the Mountain which he reviles in one chapter and yet in chapter 7 is far more willing to believe the sermon on the mount than some other obscure statement from a different book? It seems that even as a Senator he wanted the best of both worlds as long as it suited his personal needs, and even then demonstrated the ability to vilify something at one point and praise it later without even skipping a beat in the process. I have to be getting ready for work now but will make sure and check in later until my next post "Have a great day and a better tomorrow, and remember always that Chance Favors the Prepared Mind.